ADU permit process in Anaheim, California
Last verified August 29, 2026
Prepared by GetYourPermit editorial teamReport an error
This guide includes the portions of the City permit process that passed our evidence review. Confirm project-specific requirements with the City before submitting.
Where to apply
- Department
- Planning Services Division
- Contact
- 714-765-5139
Step by step
- 1
Complete City-listed pre-plan-check requirements
Obtain sewer verification Obtain meter spot report if triggered Submit new address request and site plan For JADU, provide title report and grant deed Pre-plan-check support documents
- 2
Building plan check with Planning zoning review
Submit Building plan-check package Planning zoning compliance review during plan check
- 3
Permit issuance after JADU covenant condition where applicable
Ensure City Attorney covenant is recorded for JADU JADU may proceed to building-permit issuance
What you need to submit
- JADU owner-occupancy covenant support documents: title report and grant deed — only in some cases
- Meter Spot Report — only in some cases
- New Address Request Application and site plan
- Written sewer deficiency verification
Pre-approved ADU plans
Use Anaheim’s official page to confirm which designs, site conditions, and supplemental documents qualify. Plan-check timing still depends on the project and city review.
View pre-approved plansProject-specific next step
Build your Anaheim permit report
Choose your ADU type and size to bring the City process, researched permit fees, and early construction budget into one planning report.
Sources for this guide
Additional city reference pages
The official City page confirms that the live official City fee page currently displays a Building Permit Fees link to DocumentCenter record 529, together with separate trade and impact-fee schedules.
Accessed August 28, 2026
The City PDF publishes square-foot lookup tables by construction tier and occupancy and states that 62% of the combined fee is plan review and 38% is permit inspection; no effective date was present in the reviewed text.
Accessed August 28, 2026
